Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
2 points by almkglor 5690 days ago | link | parent

It'll end up forking Arc I'm afraid: I'm doing the system in the scheme side. I've gotten the translation up, but I'm still testing it. ^^


3 points by stefano 5690 days ago | link

> It'll end up forking Arc

This is becoming unavoidable. This is really a pity, but the official Arc development is simply too slow (assuming it is moving, a quite optimistic assumption).

-----

1 point by almkglor 5686 days ago | link

Integrating it into my forked Arc, but sadly something is interacting badly with the compiler and some macro is getting stuck in an infinite loop (which, if I don't catch with a ^C early enough, will force me to actually restart my computer T.T), probably from an incorrect compile. I'm debugging it currently >.<

-----

2 points by almkglor 5685 days ago | link

Debugged! Now I just need to rewrite bits and pieces of arc.arc to clean it up and make it follow a more "axiomatic" path that will allow you to do neat things, like define how (+ (your-type 1 2) 42) will be (and adding hacks into ac.scm so that the axiomatic path isn't so slow).

-----